Zirconia vs. Acrylic: Which Material Is Better for Full-Mouth Dental Implants?
- caozheng1
- Jul 30
- 3 min read
Updated: Aug 4
When it comes to full-mouth dental implants, one of the most important decisions you'll make is the material used to create your final set of teeth. The two most common options are zirconia and acrylic, and while they may look similar at first glance, the differences in performance, durability, and aesthetics are significant.
In this guide, we’ll break down the pros and cons of zirconia vs. acrylic and explain which material may be better for your needs.
What Are Zirconia and Acrylic?
Zirconia is a high-strength ceramic that is biocompatible, highly durable, and naturally white. It resists wear and staining, making it a long-lasting solution for implant-supported bridges.
Acrylic, also known as PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate), is a durable plastic material used in both temporary and permanent implant bridges. It is often paired with a titanium substructure for strength.
Durability and Longevity
Zirconia Teeth: Zirconia is among the strongest materials used in modern dentistry. It does not wear down easily, crack, or chip with normal use, making it an excellent long-term solution. With proper care, zirconia implant bridges can last 15–20 years or more.
Acrylic Teeth: Acrylic teeth are more susceptible to wear, staining, and fractures over time — especially in patients who grind their teeth (bruxism). Typically, acrylic bridges last 5–7 years before needing repair or replacement.
Aesthetics
Zirconia can be polished to a natural, tooth-like shine. When paired with porcelain layering, the result is highly aesthetic and lifelike. It reflects light like natural enamel and is ideal for patients looking for a premium cosmetic result.
Acrylic can also be made to look natural, especially with skilled design and coloring. However, it may lose luster and stain more easily over time, particularly with coffee, tea, or smoking.
Hygiene and Maintenance
Zirconia bridges are non-porous, meaning they don’t absorb bacteria or odors and are easier to clean. This promotes better long-term gum health.
Acrylic bridges, especially when bulkier or less custom-fit, can trap food and plaque, requiring more rigorous daily cleaning to prevent inflammation or infection.
Cost Comparison
Acrylic is more affordable and often used as a temporary solution during healing. It's also an option for patients seeking a lower-cost permanent option.
Zirconia is more expensive due to its superior material strength and the advanced technology (CAD/CAM milling) required to design and manufacture it. However, its long lifespan and minimal maintenance needs often make it more cost-effective over time.
Which One Is Right for You?
Feature | Acrylic | Zirconia |
Lifespan | 5–7 years | 15–20+ years |
Aesthetics | Good | Excellent |
Strength | Moderate | Very High |
Stain Resistance | Low | High |
Hygiene | Requires more care | Easy to maintain |
Cost | Lower upfront | Higher upfront, longer-lasting |
Vitality Teeth Offers Both — But Recommends Zirconia for Long-Term Results
At Vitality, we offer both zirconia and acrylic full-mouth implant options, customized to your needs and budget. Our Signature and Statement bridges feature zirconia with options for porcelain layering, delivering a smile that’s as functional as it is beautiful.
If you're seeking maximum durability, aesthetics, and peace of mind, zirconia is our recommended material for your permanent full-mouth implant solution.
Book a Free Consultation to Compare Materials in Person
Not sure which option is right for you? During your consultation, we’ll walk you through the pros and cons of each, show real examples of both materials, and help you choose the best solution for your lifestyle and long-term health.
Call us at 202-331-3242 or book online to begin your journey.
Comments